Hosted by a lazy river |
And, like on all threads: please remember to use the "post new comment" feature rather than the "reply" feature, even when directly replying to someone else!
Open Thread: Slow Day |
Hosted by a lazy river |
Open Thread: Writer Workshop |
A couple of you have requested a special monthly open thread dedicated to talking about writing projects (and other artwork-creation). So here it is!
Pencil by Elisa Xyz |
Narnia: Non-Consensual Conversions |
[Content Note: NSFW discussion of BDSM relationships and rape fantasies. Harmful stereotypes about atheists (also at the Lewis biography link). Non-consensual acts, including rape and kidnapping.]
Narnia Recap: In which Eustace is turned back into a boy.
Voyage of the Dawn Treader, Chapter 7: How The Adventure Ended
I've been dreading this part of the chapter for a number of reasons which largely add up to it being difficult to deconstruct.
For one thing, while I accept that not everyone views That One Scene in Lions and Witches Gone Wild in Wardrobes as a crucifixion allegory, it comes across like a crucifixion allegory to me, and that context informed how I deconstructed that scene. In contrast, the scene of Eustace's de-dragoning slash conversion doesn't really come off as a straight allegory from anything in the Bible to me (though I did like muscipula's suggestion that perhaps we have a Saul/Paul "scales from the eyes" allegory on our hands), which makes it substantially harder to say intelligent things about it in terms of comparing and contrasting the source material with this text.
Feminism: Mansplaining For My Lady-Brain |
[Content Note: Graphic description of rape]
I don't consistently identify as an atheist -- more like an on-again, off-again, mostly-just-on-Tuesdays atheist (and yes, there are Wiccan atheists) -- but I like to buy a lot of books by popular atheist leaders in the movement atheism community. I own bunches and bunches of books by Richard Dawkins, Michael Shermer, Richard Carrier, and the list could go on and on. My "religion and spirituality" section in my library has more books by atheist authors than it has books by Christian and Wiccan authors combined.
Most of those books, however, have been banished to the Not Gonna Read pile because of how their authors have been behaving in public. First there was Richard Dawkins, which regular readers of my blog will already know has put me off entirely by his careless appropriation of infertile women like me in order to "edgily" promote eugenics. Then Michael Shermer was banished to the pile based on his hateful railing against women skeptics in the movement atheist community, and the recent allegations about him (and his litigious response to those allegations) have not helped endear him to me.
Now Richard Carrier, who I genuinely thought to be a good ally, has a long-winded post in "support" of the women accusing Shermer of rape in which Carrier posts a graphic depiction of something that is quite clearly rape, but which he declares is not rape. This definition of a rape as Not-Rape isn't based on rule of law (much of the post is devoted to correctly explaining why rape is rape even when the law doesn't agree) but rather because... Richard Carrier says it is! And also because women have to follow a set script and announce magic words at various points along the way in order for rape to be Legitimate Rape.
Open Thread: Sunflowers |
Hosted by a sunflower |
Open Thread: Boo-boo |
Hosted by a scrape on an arm |
Open Thread: Nose |
Hosted by a man's nose (and mouth and chin and beard...) |
Feminism: Words Matter |
[Content Note: Rape, Racism, Prisons]
Words matter.
A group of people upset or angry or negatively interested in something is not the same thing as an extrajudicial execution carried out by a mob motivated by a desire to intimidate, control, and terrorize a population of marginalized people. It is not appropriate to call things that aren't an actual lynching a lynching or a lynch mob just because the words sound nice and inflammatory when you're defensive about something or someone receiving negative attention.
Relevant example: Using the word "lynch mob" to describe people who believe a rape victim's testimony.
The outcome of a sporting event or an unfair decision on the part of an authority figure or the expectation of a state or country that its residents render taxes to subsidize the governance of the area is not the same thing as sexual assault carried out on a person against their consent or in the absence of their consent. It is not appropriate to call things that aren't rape or related assaults against bodily consent rape just because the r-word is short and punchy.
Relevant example: Using the word "rape" to describe an overwhelming victory in a gaming match.
A group of people meeting together for a short-length but intensive-depth training session is not the same thing as a military training camp for almost exclusively able-bodied people, nor is it the same thing as a prison for underage people incapable of exercising their non-consent at being locked up in that place and who were placed there against their will because they were deemed dangerous to society and/or were deemed non-conforming with social expectations of body weight, body size, body shape, gender identity, sexual orientation, or any number of other "offenses" for which underage teens and children are sent to prison because of their failure to conform to the desires of their parents. It is not appropriate to call things which aren't actual boot camps boot camps just because the word sounds really hardcore and intense. It's also not alright to elide the actual, genuine, real problems with boot camps and their use in our society.
Relevant example: Using the word "bootcamp" to describe "a weeklong opportunity for bloggers and organizers to come together to learn about business and financial structures from leading experts, examine social business case studies, such as Change.org and Purpose, and get preliminary training in fundraising and development."
I encourage people in the comments to discuss similar frequently misused words, but do please remember to use content notes.
Open Thread: Artifact |
Hosted by a four-leaf clover |
Review: To Be or Not To Be |
To Be or Not To Be: A Chooseable-Path Adventure
by Ryan North
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
To Be or Not To Be / B00ECJN7T6
How much do I like this book? I will tell you. I like this book so much that even though I participated in the Kickstarter for the book and got a paper copy AND an electronic copy in four different electronic formats, I still bought the Kindle version before writing this review just to make absolutely sure that this book will follow me around on my Kindle account for the rest of my life or until the heat death of the universe (whichever comes first).
If you like the fun and zany humor in Ryan North's "Dinosaur Comics", you will probably love this. It's not just that the idea of a Choose-Your-Own-Path Hamlet re-telling is delightful to me (though it truly is), there's also a wonderful amount of off-the-wall humor that tickles my funny bone to the core. I haven't read through the entire book (I think there are officially 3,001,181,439,094,525 different paths through this amazingly-densely-packed adventure of awesomeness), but I have read through huge chunks of the Ophelia adventure, and I loved every moment of it. Seriously.
Open Thread: Trampoline |
Hosted by trampoline tricks |
Open Thread: Enchanted |
Hosted by the sun on the water |
Metapost: Going Offline |
[Content Note: Stalking]
I'm going semi-offline for awhile, or more accurately I will be drastically reducing my visible online presence. I don't know for how long. I've posted up the deconstructions that I had in draft for the upcoming weeks, and I've set my Twitter profile to private, and this will probably be my last post for awhile.
I honestly don't know for how long. I wish I could give you a time. I wish I could give me a time. Maybe a day or maybe a week or maybe a month or maybe three months. Maybe sporadically. I've been triggered more often and more harshly in the past two days than I have in as long as I can recall, but a more immediate issue to me right now is that my mere public presence on the internet is putting individual women I care about in danger, because they're being caught up in an ever-widening net of harassment.
I'm sorry, I'm so desperately terribly horribly sorry, that I'm having to go offline for awhile. I hate having to walk away from a community I care about. I hate having to leave you all without things that I know give many of you joy. I hate having to set down my internet activism for a time when there is activism that needs to be happening. I hate how quickly a stalker and his scores of cheerleaders can target someone and tear their life apart. I hate a lot of things right now. I feel so unbelievably, crushingly guilty for leaving you all right now.
Maybe everything will be better in a week or two. I hope so. I pray so.
I deeply ask your forgiveness for walking away, and I hope that I can walk back soon. I hope you can forgive me for walking away, and I hope you can find it in your heart to welcome me back when it's safe for me to return.
In the interim, I will be reading the comments here on the board, and trying to heal from a distance without being in the thick of things making a bad situation worse with my presence. I will make sure that one way or another we have open threads going so that the community still has a safe space to congregate in. I love you all, and I am again so deeply sorry that I have to step away for a bit.
Film Corner: The Last of Us |
[Content Note: Zombie Apocalypses and *everything* bad that goes with them. Everything. Also, all the spoilers from The Last of Us, including the final scene of the game.]
(Yes, The Last of Us isn't a film, but rather it's a game, but I didn't want to make a whole new tag. Massive spoilers herein, along with a lot of triggery stuff.)
Film Corner: Percy Jackson and the Sea of Fail |
[Content Note: Racism, Misogyny, Holocaust appropriation, Percy Jackson Spoilers]
We went to go see Percy Jackson and the Sea of Monsters primarily because the trailer had Captain Malcolm Reynolds (i.e., Nathan Fillion) in it. His bits were, as anticipated, great. He also made a great Firefly joke, referring to a fictional TV show within the movie as "the best television show ever" before announcing "so of course it was cancelled". The sad face he held as the beat of the joke was possibly just a little too long, but we forgave him for it because he deserves all the nice things.
@ screencrush.com |
Feminism: Storify Followup |
[Content Note: Stalking, PTSD, Death / Mental Illness]
Melissa McEwan at Shakesville, who is the kindest person I know, has offered to publish a followup on her site to the Storify situation. This keeps me from having to host the material here and get a direct-to-email transcript of every hateful troll who posts on the subject. (Which was the situation we had yesterday.)
The full story is here.
Twilight: Human Time and Victoria's Secret |
[Content Note: Boundary Trespass of Unconscious People]
Twilight Summary: In Chapter 14, Edward and Bella spend the night together.
Twilight, Chapter 14: Mind Over Matter
I cannot apologize enough for neglecting Twilight for so long, and I cannot praise highly enough Dawn M and Silver Adept for their wonderful guest posts which got us through the dry stretch while my brain was otherwise occupied. Here's hoping I haven't gotten rusty and lost my Twilight Touch.
“Why don’t you sit with me,” he suggested, putting a cold hand on mine. “How’s the heart?”
“You tell me — I’m sure you hear it better than I do.”
I felt his quiet laughter shake the bed.
We sat there for a moment in silence, both listening to my heartbeat slow. I thought about having Edward in my room, with my father in the house.
“Can I have a minute to be human?” I asked.
“Certainly.” He gestured with one hand that I should proceed.
“Stay,” I said, trying to look severe.
“Yes, ma’am.” And he made a show of becoming a statue on the edge of my bed.
I hopped up, grabbing my pajamas from off the floor, my bag of toiletries off the desk. I left the light off and slipped out, closing the door.
I could hear the sound from the TV rising up the stairs. I banged the bathroom door loudly, so Charlie wouldn’t come up to bother me.
I think I've mentioned that I deliberately haven't read the Twilight books after Twilight itself, though I have seen the movies. I find myself, therefore, wondering if this concept of "human time" ever comes up again or if this is the only time we see it. I'm fairly certain this is the only time we see it in Twilight itself.
Feminism: The Day The CEO of Storify Sent My Name To A Stalker |
[Content Note: Stalking, PTSD, Death / Mental Illness]
There will be more on this later, but as if I didn't have enough stress, in a Twitter conversation that I was having on the lack of an anti-stalking provision in the Storify TOS, the CEO of Storify used the Twitter "@[name]" feature to send the names of everyone in the conversation expressing concern about about stalking-via-Storify directly into the mentions of a known stalker who they claimed to have "warned" but refuse to actually ban from using their service.
The known stalker then started stalking me, as well as everyone else in the conversation. And a few people who tweet at me in general. Because the CEO of Storify gave him the heads-up that we were the sort of people who don't like to be stalked.
I don't talk about it much, but I'm a survivor of online stalking. My PTSD is triggered more right now than it has ever been triggered before. And the CEO has not only refused to apologize or address the situation, but is flat-out pretending he didn't do what he publicly did on Twitter. (I'm sure the tweet will be deleted soon! A few days ago I would have Storifyed it! *bitter laughter*)
I'm going to crawl under my desk now and hope the shaking stops.
Update: And you know what is awesome? The fact that the (apparently) white male CEO who made a stalker aware of my existence and crowds and crowds of (apparently) white men in my mentions explaining to me that this is No Big Deal (apparently) do not fucking understand that women die from being stalked. But, yeah, no, I'm sure this stalker who has invested thousands of hours into online stalking of women and whose very name is a reference to a female atheist being propositioned in an elevator in a way that made her concerned for her safety, I'm sure he's totally harmless. I feel solid about that.
Open Thread: Peacock |
Hosted by a peacock |
Metapost: A Somewhat Long And Rambly Update On Transcripts |
I keep feeling like I should give some kind of update on the heady, wild, busy whirlwind that is my life right now, and keep finding that I lack the words to convey things well. So here are some things.
[CN: Medical Problems] Within the last week, I've had large-and-mysterious-and-very-painful lumps flare up all over the inside of my lips and the roof of my mouth. I finally got in to see my dentist today (which is the one medical provider in my life whom I actually like, so at least that wasn't stressful) and he declared the problem to be entirely stress-related, though he finally conceded that my favorite brand of lemonade might also be at fault. But he strongly prefers the stress explanation.
I've also, possibly unrelatedly, broken out with some kind of entire-body-wide heat rash that itches like fuck and keeps me from sleeping well at night. This started in mid-July with no indication yet of easing up. I'm supposed to see my general practitioner on Thursday, but I suspect she'll just tell me it's stress-related because that's what doctors do. *shakes fist at sky in frustration*
[/End CN]
I don't feel particularly stressed, but it has been pointed out to me by a few people I love online that I've been going on this whole Texas abortion activism slash transcript project almost non-stop since June 25th, which might to an unbiased observer be classified as potentially stressful. Mmph. But I categorically refuse to abandon the project or even to consciously slow down on it, because (a) it's needed and it's needed now, not later, and (b) I'm completely incapable of relaxing when I have unfinished business hanging over my head. That's just how my brain works -- if I tried to slow down, the act of trying to slow down would stress me out even more.
So in an attempt to compromise, I've made a semi-decision. I had originally planned to work out the following videos for the transcript project:
• 6/20 Citizen Testimony
• 6/25 Senate Floor Filibuster
• 7/8 Citizen Testimony
• 7/9 House Amendments
• 7/13 Senate Amendments
The bolded videos above have been either fully spliced and sent out for transcribing or (in the case of the 7/13 video) have been mostly spliced and sent out. The remaining two citizen testimony sessions have not been spliced or sent out.
I would very much like to splice and send out the citizen testimonies, but I am not sure if I have the spoons to listen to the gut-wrenching testimony given in these videos. What I most need right now is one or two volunteers who have the spoons to listen to 11 hours and 16 hours of testimony respectively and mark out clear splicing points for me. The way I mark out splicing points is simple but time-consuming. I have an Excel sheet that looks like this:
Start Time | End Time | Length |
0:00:00 | 0:10:53 | 0:10:53 |
0:10:53 | 0:25:51 | 0:14:58 |
0:25:51 | 0:40:13 | 0:14:22 |
0:40:13 | 0:52:32 | 0:12:19 |
0:52:32 | 1:02:32 | 0:10:00 |
8:03:50 | 8:19:46 | 0:15:56 |
11:55:30 | 12:03:59 | 0:08:29 |
8:19:46 | 8:40:20 | 0:20:34 |
8:40:20 | 8:55:23 | 0:15:03 |
8:55:23 | 9:16:28 | 0:21:05 |
Narnia: Love the Sinner, Period |
[Content Note: Colonialism, Slavery, Violence]
[NB: The title of this post is a reference to the platitude "love the sinner, hate the sin" which is almost universally used as a rhetorical cudgel to harm innocent people who are guilty only of a failure to conform to various social standards, while excusing the hateful person from the responsibility of their harmful actions. This title is not meant to suggest that real acts of harm, such as those perpetuated by Caspian and Edmund, should be summarily excused.]
Narnia Recap: In which Eustace is turned back into a boy.
Voyage of the Dawn Treader, Chapter 7: How The Adventure Ended
Alright! After however many solid weeks of fobbing ya'll off with tiny posts because I've been burning the candle all fifteen ends, today we are going to start going through the unnecessarily long and violent process of Eustace's conversion. And remember! The best thing about metaphors is that you can write any old crap on the page and someone will work out a profound meaning for you to have meant all along because people are awesome pattern-spotters, even when the patterns weren't, strictly speaking, put there on purpose. (Which is a long and delightful way of saying that there are going to be Disagreements about how to interpret this. Tally-ho.)
Open Thread: Herbs |
Hosted by ornamental rosemary |
Storify: 2013-07-12 Texas Senate Amendments |
Here is a collection of tweets from the 7/12 Texas Senate session where amendments were considered for SB1 and the bill was finally passed.
Storify: 2013-07-08 Texas Senate Citizen Testimony |
Here is a collection of tweets from the 7/8 citizen testimony during the Senate Health and Human Service Committee hearing.
Open Thread: Faith and Science |
Hosted by a microscope |
Twilight: Girlfriends to the Gods |
Girlfriends to the Gods: Female Agency in RED vs the Twilight Saga
by Dawn M
[Content Note: Spoilers for the movies RED and RED 2 and for future events in the Twilight universe; kidnapping; lack of consent; some passing references to violence and death Also note: This analysis is based on the movie universe for RED as I am not familiar with the comic book. Discussion based on the comic book is welcomed.]
Open Thread: Damsels in Distress (Part 3) |
Belatedly, (thank you for the reminder, Depizan!), here is the third Damsels in Distress video from FemFreq. And it is, as with the previous ones, quite awesome. Discuss at your leisure here since the YouTube comments are disabled.
Open Thread: Stone Door |
Hosted by a door in a rock wall |
Narnia: God's Will For Thee, But Not For Me |
[Content Note: Reproductive Rights, Healthcare Denial, Immigration Inequality, Cancer]
Narnia Recap: In which Eustace is turned back into a boy.
Voyage of the Dawn Treader, Chapter 7: How The Adventure Ended
I wanted to get to Eustace's redemption narrative this week, but I've been feeling sickly all weekend and I can't seem to shake it. So instead today will be a short one, with my apologies. I hope that we can get to Eustace's salvation metaphor next week, Aslan-willing.
But of course what hung over everyone like a cloud was the problem of what to do with their dragon when they were ready to sail. They tried not to talk of it when he was there, but he couldn’t help overhearing things like, “Would he fit all along one side of the deck? And we’d have to shift all the stores to the other side down below so as to balance,” or, “Would towing him be any good?” or “Would he be able to keep up by flying?” and (most often of all), “But how are we to feed him?” And poor Eustace realized more and more that since the first day he came on board he had been an unmitigated nuisance and that he was now a greater nuisance still. And this ate into his mind, just as that bracelet ate into his foreleg. He knew that it only made it worse to tear at it with his great teeth, but he couldn’t help tearing now and then, especially on hot nights.
Open Thread: Banana |
Hosted by bananas! |
Feminism: Anonymous Downvotes |
by Silver Adept
Riddle me this, New Disqus (and probably Facebook, Google Plus, and the like):
If I want to upvote something, a list of all the people who also upvoted it appears (including Guest upvotes), so I can see who else thinks this thing is great.
If I downvote something, the downvote is recorded in the system, but no list of usernames appears, not even any Guest votes.
Why are critics and potential trolls given the benefit of anonymity, while people expressing positive sentiment for things are broadcast to everyone, potentially so that such trolls can find a new account to descend upon?
Why do I have to risk more exposure of hostile forces finding my support for something if I do it on the Internet, when I could support something financially, even with a large amount of financial support, and be afforded anonymity? Why can I donate to PACs and certain political organizations and be assured that my name will never appear in the public record, yet pushing a like button generates an immediate and publicly-accessible record of my support?
Why is my ability to say I don't like something more protected than my ability to say I do like something?
And how many voices that would otherwise speak are silenced because they can't afford to be identified, outed, recognized, or connected with something because of the repercussions?
Privileging the critic with anonymity without a corresponding option for the supporter biases the system toward having more critics feel free to express their sentiment than supporters. It gives trolls a haven to hide in and the ability to potentially affect what things are seen and where, as well as what kind of weight and credibility is assigned to each comment. It lets the people who should have the least control over things gain the most control.
So what are comment systems saying, implicitly or explicitly, when they require a record of every like, but don't for every dislike?
Related Reading: Why I Don't Support A Twitter Report Abuse Button
Related Reading: Tropes vs. Women
Metapost: Sick |
I'm sick. Some kind of stomach bug that's been steadily getting worse since Friday. Going back to bed.
Storify: TwitterSilence, TwitterNoise, and Gamera MST3K |
Folks, I'm going to be live-tweeting the MST3K Gamera movies on my jail account @MardollAna. Switch over there if you wanna follow or see the (delayed) Storify tweets below.
This is in honor of today's #TwitterSilence call in support of the Report Abuse Button and the #TwitterNoise pushback. And it's being done on my jail account partly because my main account will be retweeting more meaningful activism (and I don't want that to get lost in the shuffle) and partly because my main account is still being storified for Texas tweets and I'm close to pushing my tweets off the 3200 page limit and I don't want that to happen yet.
I will be watching this MST3K Gamera Box Set for my live-tweeting.
Storify: 2013-07-09 Texas House Amendments |
Below is a Storify collection of my tweets on the Texas House amendments session of 7/9. Please also note that there is a transcript of the session going up on Google Docs and the videos from the session can be viewed on my YouTube page.
Feminism: Name-and-Shame Bullies |
[Content Note: Bullying, Harassment]
[NB: Not only women are subject to harassment, but this is a general post in response to a specific woman's experience, hence the use of "woman" and "her" throughout the post.]
Yesterday, activist Shelby Knox linked to a story about a female MMO gamer who regularly received rape-threats from other MMO players, refused to be brushed off by support-staff who told her to simply rename her character to a male-coded name, escalated her complaints to the game company's CEO, and was then banned by the CEO because he was "tired of hearing about" female gamers reporting rape-threats to him. The story was submitted with a pseudonym for the banned female gamer and with no naming of the CEO and the game company he represents.
What then followed in the article comments was the same harmful and harassing dynamic I have seen fully eleventy-billion times: people claiming to believe the female gamer (and some who probably actually do, because this isn't just a Troll Phenomena, it is also an Ally-Fail Phenomena) demanding with increasing aggression that the pseudonymous gamer "name-and-shame" the MMO company and CEO.
Love that half the comments call her a liar; half shame her for not naming the company. Ugh. @ShelbyKnox @amaditalks
— Ana Mardoll (@AnaMardoll) August 2, 2013
PEOPLE: Aggressive demands to Name-and-Shame are shaming and abusive. And it centers YOU over the victim. Don't do that.
— Ana Mardoll (@AnaMardoll) August 2, 2013
Fat Acceptance: In Totally Not Surprising News |
[Content Note: Fat Hatred, Reproductive Health, Economic Disparity]
In a move that comes completely as a surprise to everyone who hasn't been paying attention to the national discourse about employment, healthcare, and Evul Fatties!!1!, employer Pennsylvania State University is imposing a $100 monthly surcharge on employees who don't meet new health [sic] requirements:
...instead of offering “carrots” to its employees for seeking preventive care, Pennsylvania State University starting this fall is opting for the “stick,” imposing a $100 monthly surcharge on those who don’t meet new health requirements.
[...] By November, faculty and their spouses or domestic partners covered by university health care must complete an online wellness profile and physical exam. They’re also required to complete a more invasive biometric screening, including a “full lipid profile” and glucose, body mass index and waist circumference measurements.
Mark Pauly, a professor of health care management and business economics at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, said he’d heard of a few other employers using the “stick” approach, but not for so “daunting” a menu of exams.
“The evidence does not really support the idea that this forced wellness helps, but employers these days are afraid to try anything else,” he said in an e-mail. “It is a mystery to me why Penn State would start irritating their workers.”
Although not immediately clear, Levin suggested that Penn State’s plan could still fall into the first category if “framed” differently.
“The upshot of incentive programs is that people end up with different financial rewards,” he said. “If you think of the people who get less as the baseline, those who get more are getting a ‘bonus.’ If you think of the people who get more as the baseline, those who get less are getting a ‘penalty.’ ”
Copyright 2010 Ana Mardoll.
Powered by Blogger. Comments by Disqus. This site uses cookies.